<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Dangers of Interior Design Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idpc-nw.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idpc-nw.org</link>
	<description>Protecting interior designers&#039; right to practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IN THE NEWS:  FLORIDA DESIGN REGULATION by LEGISLATION &#124;Todays&#039; Home</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2010/07/18/in-the-news-florida-design-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>LEGISLATION &#124;Todays&#039; Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/?p=133#comment-342</guid>
		<description>[...] learn more about negative effects of legislation, watch the short video.&#160;       Posted in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] learn more about negative effects of legislation, watch the short video.&nbsp;       Posted in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FREEDOM FIGHT IN OREGON by LEGISLATION &#124;Todays&#039; Home</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2011/02/03/freedom-fight-in-oregon/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>LEGISLATION &#124;Todays&#039; Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/?p=173#comment-341</guid>
		<description>[...] pay more for their professional services.&#160; There is more information about HB-2491 in my previous blog, and this site contains detailed information about what organizations are behind similar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pay more for their professional services.&nbsp; There is more information about HB-2491 in my previous blog, and this site contains detailed information about what organizations are behind similar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FREEDOM FIGHT IN OREGON by Jay Plesset</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2011/02/03/freedom-fight-in-oregon/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Plesset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/?p=173#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Oregon bill is one of the most restrictive, powerful bills I&#039;ve ever seen.  The proposed board appears to have sweeping power to do pretty much whatever it would choose to do, AND any fines it levies will be added to the Board&#039;s funds.  To me, that sounds a lot like the old Inquisition, where an accused was presumed guilty, and there were no not-guilty verdicts.  

Are YOU ready to face a Board, made up largely of your competitors, to prove that you either are qualified to do work, or that you didn&#039;t so something an anonymous accuser has claimed?  This is bad law, and I continue to oppose it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Oregon bill is one of the most restrictive, powerful bills I&#8217;ve ever seen.  The proposed board appears to have sweeping power to do pretty much whatever it would choose to do, AND any fines it levies will be added to the Board&#8217;s funds.  To me, that sounds a lot like the old Inquisition, where an accused was presumed guilty, and there were no not-guilty verdicts.  </p>
<p>Are YOU ready to face a Board, made up largely of your competitors, to prove that you either are qualified to do work, or that you didn&#8217;t so something an anonymous accuser has claimed?  This is bad law, and I continue to oppose it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FREEDOM FIGHT IN OREGON by Patrice O Actkins</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2011/02/03/freedom-fight-in-oregon/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrice O Actkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/?p=173#comment-212</guid>
		<description>The proposed Bill, and Oregon&#039;s Interior Design Communities, are the stongest, friendliest and most bonded group in the country.&#160; Anyone who disagrees is either grossly misinformed, or fearful, or up to something under the regulations radar, so&#160;shouldn&#039;t be practicing anyway.&#160; Credentials don&#039;t mean anything without enforcement or a avenue for the public to express their grievances.&#160; Perhaps this is why members of the Freedom Fight in Oregon are so afraid of this time bomb, because the public&#160; will quickly figure out they have been getting lemons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposed Bill, and Oregon&#039;s Interior Design Communities, are the stongest, friendliest and most bonded group in the country.&nbsp; Anyone who disagrees is either grossly misinformed, or fearful, or up to something under the regulations radar, so&nbsp;shouldn&#039;t be practicing anyway.&nbsp; Credentials don&#039;t mean anything without enforcement or a avenue for the public to express their grievances.&nbsp; Perhaps this is why members of the Freedom Fight in Oregon are so afraid of this time bomb, because the public&nbsp; will quickly figure out they have been getting lemons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FREEDOM FIGHT IN OREGON by Tweets that mention The Dangers of Interior Design Legislation » FREEDOM FIGHT IN OREGON -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2011/02/03/freedom-fight-in-oregon/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Dangers of Interior Design Legislation » FREEDOM FIGHT IN OREGON -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/?p=173#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Diane Plesset, Diane Plesset. Diane Plesset said: FREEDOM FIGHT IN OREGON http://bit.ly/eh7cKx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Diane Plesset, Diane Plesset. Diane Plesset said: FREEDOM FIGHT IN OREGON <a href="http://bit.ly/eh7cKx" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/eh7cKx</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PETITE LADY PRESENTS POWER-PACKED INFORMATION by Diane Plesset</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2010/04/30/petite-lady-presents-power-packed-information-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Plesset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/wordpress/?p=92#comment-7</guid>
		<description>One of the purposes for writing this article was to motivate designers to be more pro-active, as you are going to do, i.e., read contents of proposed bills to make an &lt;em&gt;informed decision&lt;/em&gt; about your future.  I have read a large percentage of bills.  While there are some differences in the language and order, virtually all of the documents follow templates provided by ASID, IIDA, and NCIDQ.  There is a difference between Title acts and Practice acts; one limits what you can call yourself, and the other limits what you can do.

I encourage you to get honest facts from reliable sources.  Unfortunately, the three organizations mentioned above have not provided honest information, because they have an agenda, to control the interior design profession in this country.  For many years, I believed what they said, what they represented.  In California, where I went to design school, and where my business was located for over 18 years, they have a totally different system of certification than any other state.  It wasn&#039;t until I started doing my own research -- similar to what you&#039;ll be doing -- that I decided to join the fight against all legislation.  

Questions for you to ponder:  1. What will happen to our free market system, if competition is obliterated by a select few? 2. Why do we need to certify or register interior designers, to protect the H, S, and W of the public, when there are building codes and building officials already doing it?  3. Has there been an outcry from the public &lt;strong&gt;IN FAVOR&lt;/strong&gt; of state certification or regulation of interior designers?  4. Can anyone provide honest, reliable, factual evidence that consumers have been &lt;em&gt;harmed&lt;/em&gt; by interior designers?  To date, no one has cited any examples to provide supporting evidence in favor of legislation.  

Education is very important to rise to the top of any profession, especially in today&#039;s economy.  Yes, I have lost jobs to designers who had little or no education, and much less experience.  Does it make me upset?  You bet!  Do I want to put these designers out of business through legislation?  Heck, no!  Because I believe strongly in the American free market system.  I believe that there are talented people who are not able to go to school, who deserve a chance to prove their worth to the interior design profession.  If someone really cares about what they do, they&#039;ll make every effort to learn, to improve as a professional.

One last question for you to ponder, about grandfathering.  If the purpose of legislation is to weed out unqualified people, but they have enough proven experience and O-T-J training, they might qualify to be grandfathered.  Isn&#039;t this concept tantamount to consumer fraud?  The three organizations lobbying for legislation through state coalitions rely on strict  Education, Experience, and Examination requirements.  Most, if not all, affiliate members of ASID and IIDA believe that they will be grandfathered, without passing the NCIDQ.  Are they more qualified as a designer the day &lt;em&gt;after&lt;/em&gt; they&#039;re given a state certification number, than they were the day &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; they became certified?  In the past,  practicing designers could be grandfathered to obtain state certification.  In most of the legislation I&#039;ve read, grandfathering is allowed for a specific period of time, pending the applicant&#039;s passage of the NCIDQ.  No other path to certification  is offered in any bill I&#039;ve read.

Think about all of this, and do your research to make an informed decision about your future, and the future of interior design in the United States.  You&#039;ll probably come to the same conclusion that I did:  Interior Design Legislation is NOT inevitable, and it is NOT NEEDED.

Diane Plesset, CMKBD, NCIDQ #13029, C.A.P.S.
IDPC-NW (Oregon Chapter)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the purposes for writing this article was to motivate designers to be more pro-active, as you are going to do, i.e., read contents of proposed bills to make an <em>informed decision</em> about your future.  I have read a large percentage of bills.  While there are some differences in the language and order, virtually all of the documents follow templates provided by ASID, IIDA, and NCIDQ.  There is a difference between Title acts and Practice acts; one limits what you can call yourself, and the other limits what you can do.</p>
<p>I encourage you to get honest facts from reliable sources.  Unfortunately, the three organizations mentioned above have not provided honest information, because they have an agenda, to control the interior design profession in this country.  For many years, I believed what they said, what they represented.  In California, where I went to design school, and where my business was located for over 18 years, they have a totally different system of certification than any other state.  It wasn&#8217;t until I started doing my own research &#8212; similar to what you&#8217;ll be doing &#8212; that I decided to join the fight against all legislation.  </p>
<p>Questions for you to ponder:  1. What will happen to our free market system, if competition is obliterated by a select few? 2. Why do we need to certify or register interior designers, to protect the H, S, and W of the public, when there are building codes and building officials already doing it?  3. Has there been an outcry from the public <strong>IN FAVOR</strong> of state certification or regulation of interior designers?  4. Can anyone provide honest, reliable, factual evidence that consumers have been <em>harmed</em> by interior designers?  To date, no one has cited any examples to provide supporting evidence in favor of legislation.  </p>
<p>Education is very important to rise to the top of any profession, especially in today&#8217;s economy.  Yes, I have lost jobs to designers who had little or no education, and much less experience.  Does it make me upset?  You bet!  Do I want to put these designers out of business through legislation?  Heck, no!  Because I believe strongly in the American free market system.  I believe that there are talented people who are not able to go to school, who deserve a chance to prove their worth to the interior design profession.  If someone really cares about what they do, they&#8217;ll make every effort to learn, to improve as a professional.</p>
<p>One last question for you to ponder, about grandfathering.  If the purpose of legislation is to weed out unqualified people, but they have enough proven experience and O-T-J training, they might qualify to be grandfathered.  Isn&#8217;t this concept tantamount to consumer fraud?  The three organizations lobbying for legislation through state coalitions rely on strict  Education, Experience, and Examination requirements.  Most, if not all, affiliate members of ASID and IIDA believe that they will be grandfathered, without passing the NCIDQ.  Are they more qualified as a designer the day <em>after</em> they&#8217;re given a state certification number, than they were the day <em>before</em> they became certified?  In the past,  practicing designers could be grandfathered to obtain state certification.  In most of the legislation I&#8217;ve read, grandfathering is allowed for a specific period of time, pending the applicant&#8217;s passage of the NCIDQ.  No other path to certification  is offered in any bill I&#8217;ve read.</p>
<p>Think about all of this, and do your research to make an informed decision about your future, and the future of interior design in the United States.  You&#8217;ll probably come to the same conclusion that I did:  Interior Design Legislation is NOT inevitable, and it is NOT NEEDED.</p>
<p>Diane Plesset, CMKBD, NCIDQ #13029, C.A.P.S.<br />
IDPC-NW (Oregon Chapter)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PETITE LADY PRESENTS POWER-PACKED INFORMATION by Cindy</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2010/04/30/petite-lady-presents-power-packed-information-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/wordpress/?p=92#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Although this post mentions many points that sound alarming, it seems to be making very general assumptions. I am curious to know if the legislation proposed by every state is the same. From my limited search so far it appears that not all proposed legislation is as exclusive as this post claims it to be. 

I suppose it all goes back to educating oneself on what is actually being proposed in whatever state you work in. I don&#039;t mean to be contrary, but I agree with the first &quot;E,&quot; education, and will remain skeptical about all positions, for and against legislation until I have learned the true facts myself.

If all that has been said in the recent posts have been true for my state then I might oppose legislation, but if the legislation is indeed meant to protect the health and safety of the end user, I will support legislation. We’ll see what the facts say I guess.

(I have noticed the inclusion of a “grandfather” clause in many of the proposed bills I’ve seen. Maybe that would help).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this post mentions many points that sound alarming, it seems to be making very general assumptions. I am curious to know if the legislation proposed by every state is the same. From my limited search so far it appears that not all proposed legislation is as exclusive as this post claims it to be. </p>
<p>I suppose it all goes back to educating oneself on what is actually being proposed in whatever state you work in. I don&#8217;t mean to be contrary, but I agree with the first &#8220;E,&#8221; education, and will remain skeptical about all positions, for and against legislation until I have learned the true facts myself.</p>
<p>If all that has been said in the recent posts have been true for my state then I might oppose legislation, but if the legislation is indeed meant to protect the health and safety of the end user, I will support legislation. We’ll see what the facts say I guess.</p>
<p>(I have noticed the inclusion of a “grandfather” clause in many of the proposed bills I’ve seen. Maybe that would help).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF CREATIVITY? by Diane Plesset</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2010/04/20/government-control-of-creativity/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Plesset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/wordpress/?p=39#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF CREATIVITY? by Rich Coxon</title>
		<link>http://idpc-nw.org/2010/04/20/government-control-of-creativity/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Coxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idpc-nw.org/wordpress/?p=39#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Diane,

Keep up the go work.  I am opposed to this attempt by Government to impose regulation on a profession that should not be.  I will contact my representatives and express my opposition.

Best Regards,

Rich Coxon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diane,</p>
<p>Keep up the go work.  I am opposed to this attempt by Government to impose regulation on a profession that should not be.  I will contact my representatives and express my opposition.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Rich Coxon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

